Methodology
Methodology
ModelCompliance.ai reviews public documentation from B2B AI SaaS companies to understand how clearly they disclose AI-related governance, model use, customer-data handling, transparency, and buyer-facing evidence.
Important context
This is a public documentation/transparency review, not a legal compliance determination, legal opinion, certification, audit, or assurance engagement.
What we review
Public documentation, policies, trust centres, model/provider references, and related public materials.
What we do not claim
We do not assess private controls, legal status, or buyer-specific product deployments.
Evidence statuses
Clear public evidence was found.
Related evidence was found, but it does not fully answer the check.
No public evidence was found during review.
Evidence exists but is ambiguous or difficult to interpret.
The check appears not applicable based on the public product profile.
Initial evidence checks
Framework-informed themes
Checks may be tagged to themes inspired by EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF / GenAI Profile, and ISO/IEC 42001. The mapping is thematic only and does not claim formal conformity, certification, legal status, or official endorsement.
Corrections and disputes
Submit evidence
Companies may submit corrections or additional public evidence for free.
Editorial review
Profiles are updated only when supporting public evidence justifies the change.
Under review
Disputed profiles can be reviewed internally and marked under review when appropriate.