C

Transparency profile

Clay

Public documentation review covering AI enrichment and Clay AI workflows. Findings reflect the linked first-party sources as reviewed on 4 October 2026. Private and unlinked material was not assessed.

Category
AI Sales and Revenue Tools
Last reviewed
Oct 4, 2026
Confidence
Medium confidence
Evidence checks
12
Public AI Documentation Score
Moderate public documentation
Evidence-based documentation signal, based on public sources only.
Found6
Partial0
Not found0
Unclear / N/A6
Source links
2
Framework tags
0
Profile status
Published
This transparency profile is based on public evidence only. It does not certify, determine legal status, or assess private controls.

Evidence status summary

Found
6
Found evidence checks
Partial
0
Partial evidence checks
Not found
0
Not found evidence checks
Unclear
6
Unclear evidence checks
Not applicable
0
Not applicable evidence checks

Source-linked review

Evidence checks

Each row records the public documentation signal, source links, freshness, and thematic framework tags.

Review methodology
Evidence checkStatusSummarySourcesLast checkedThemes
AI-specific privacy/data handling statement
FoundMedium confidence
The guide explains which workflow data is submitted to AI services.Oct 4, 2026
None recorded
AI usage disclosure
FoundMedium confidence
Clay explains AI enrichment and workflow features.Oct 4, 2026
None recorded
Customer data training statement
FoundMedium confidence
Clay states customer data is not used to train Clay or its AI providers' models.Oct 4, 2026
None recorded
Framework references or governance alignment
UnclearLow confidence
The reviewed public sources do not establish this signal for AI enrichment and Clay AI workflows. This is a limit of the reviewed material, not a finding about private practices.Oct 4, 2026
None recorded
Human oversight statement
UnclearLow confidence
The reviewed public sources do not establish this signal for AI enrichment and Clay AI workflows. This is a limit of the reviewed material, not a finding about private practices.Oct 4, 2026
None recorded
AI incident response statement
UnclearLow confidence
The reviewed public sources do not establish this signal for AI enrichment and Clay AI workflows. This is a limit of the reviewed material, not a finding about private practices.Oct 4, 2026
None recorded
Model card/system card or equivalent
UnclearLow confidence
The reviewed public sources do not establish this signal for AI enrichment and Clay AI workflows. This is a limit of the reviewed material, not a finding about private practices.Oct 4, 2026
None recorded
Model/provider disclosure
FoundMedium confidence
The guide identifies OpenAI, Anthropic and Google model services.Oct 4, 2026
None recorded
Responsible AI/governance policy
UnclearLow confidence
The reviewed public sources do not establish this signal for AI enrichment and Clay AI workflows. This is a limit of the reviewed material, not a finding about private practices.Oct 4, 2026
None recorded
AI safety/testing/evals/red-teaming statement
UnclearLow confidence
The reviewed public sources do not establish this signal for AI enrichment and Clay AI workflows. This is a limit of the reviewed material, not a finding about private practices.Oct 4, 2026
None recorded
Security/trust centre availability
FoundMedium confidence
Clay provides a public trust centre.Oct 4, 2026
None recorded
Subprocessor or AI vendor disclosure
FoundMedium confidence
The guide points to its trust centre and subprocessor information.Oct 4, 2026
None recorded

Source list

Framework themes

No framework tags recorded.

Help improve this profile.

Submit a correction or claim profile review for free. Updates are based on supporting public evidence.